Comments on: Bilski’s patent application – the published parts http://news.swpat.org/2010/07/bilskis-patent-application-the-published-parts/ Sat, 24 Jul 2010 16:07:43 +0100 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Gibus http://news.swpat.org/2010/07/bilskis-patent-application-the-published-parts/#comment-4950 Gibus Thu, 15 Jul 2010 22:40:44 +0000 http://news.swpat.org/?p=555#comment-4950 I've just posted on wiki discussion page (http://en.swpat.org/wiki/Talk:Bilski%27s_patent_application_text) a link to a PDF with some more claims (1-9, see PDF P. 88): http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/sol/2007-1130bilski_joint_appendix.pdf I’ve just posted on wiki discussion page (http://en.swpat.org/wiki/Talk:Bilski%27s_patent_application_text) a link to a PDF with some more claims (1-9, see PDF P. 88): http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/sol/2007-1130bilski_joint_appendix.pdf

]]> By: Ciaran http://news.swpat.org/2010/07/bilskis-patent-application-the-published-parts/#comment-4946 Ciaran Mon, 12 Jul 2010 17:17:42 +0000 http://news.swpat.org/?p=555#comment-4946 Thanks for the pointers about the secrecy rule change; it's something I plan to look into. I heard the League for Programming Freedom played a key rule in getting that rule changed, but I've no evidence to back that up. I guess I'll document it here: http://en.swpat.org/wiki/Legislation_in_the_USA That's funny about the google link. The "&dq=08/833,892" has nothing to do with the page content, it just tells google.com to put "08/833,892" in the search box. I'll have to watch out for that. So this url also works (if someone wants to link to that other patent): http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=JgOGAAAAEBAJ Thanks for the pointers about the secrecy rule change; it’s something I plan to look into. I heard the League for Programming Freedom played a key rule in getting that rule changed, but I’ve no evidence to back that up. I guess I’ll document it here:
http://en.swpat.org/wiki/Legislation_in_the_USA

That’s funny about the google link. The “&dq=08/833,892″ has nothing to do with the page content, it just tells google.com to put “08/833,892″ in the search box. I’ll have to watch out for that.

So this url also works (if someone wants to link to that other patent):
http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=JgOGAAAAEBAJ

]]> By: les http://news.swpat.org/2010/07/bilskis-patent-application-the-published-parts/#comment-4945 les Mon, 12 Jul 2010 16:49:48 +0000 http://news.swpat.org/?p=555#comment-4945 ooops, I take it back, that is another application by Bilski et al. I believe 08/833,892 was filed before the rule change and so, may still be confidential. ooops, I take it back, that is another application by Bilski et al. I believe 08/833,892 was filed before the rule change and so, may still be confidential.

]]> By: les http://news.swpat.org/2010/07/bilskis-patent-application-the-published-parts/#comment-4944 les Mon, 12 Jul 2010 16:45:53 +0000 http://news.swpat.org/?p=555#comment-4944 Since about 2000 (maybe a year or two later) U.S. Patent applications have only been held confidential for 18 months, after that, they are published. Application no. 08/833,892 is available here: http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=JgOGAAAAEBAJ&dq=08/833,892 Since about 2000 (maybe a year or two later) U.S. Patent applications have only been held confidential for 18 months, after that, they are published. Application no. 08/833,892 is available here:

http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=JgOGAAAAEBAJ&dq=08/833,892

]]>